Sweep Call Buying Ranking: Top TTM Squeeze Tickers SPCX, AMD, ARM Lead Bullish Flow
Analysis generated
Can you order this by their highest bullish $$ . Focus on calls bought and that too sweeps as higher bullishness
I'll re-frame this screen specifically around bought calls that are SWEEPS (aggressive, urgent bullish positioning) across the net-bullish squeeze names, then rank by thatThe strict filter (bought calls + sweeps only) returned zero unusual flow for all 10 tickers on the latest day (9/8/2026). Let me broaden to confirm — checking whether bought-call activity exists at all (any execution style) for the top names, and running the sweep filter across the remaining squeeze tickers.
Let me complete the bought-call picture on the remaining squeeze names to rank them properly by directional call buying (sweeps = highest convictioThe bought-call sweep filter came back nearly empty across the board — only $ASX had one. That's a meaningful finding: the "net bullish" flow on most of these squeeze names isn't call buying. Let me verify what's actually driving the bullish premium (likely sold puts) for the biggest names.The per-trade sweep data is nearly empty on the latest day, so let me pull the aggregated 8-cell money-flow breakdown (which isolates sweep call buys per ticker) to rank by the strongest bullish signal — bought calls executed as sweeps.Here's the full ranking for the 9/8/2026 session, ordered by sweep call buying (urgent, aggressive call premium) — the strongest bullish signal per your criteria. All tickers are in a TTM Squeeze with net bullish flow.
Ranked by Sweep Call Buying (highest bullishness first)
| Rank | Ticker | Spot | Sweep Calls Bought | Block Calls Bought | Total Call Buying | Net Premium | Bullish Share | strongSweepNet* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $SPCX | $153.47 | $2.27M (26) | $0.33M | $2.59M | +$1.18M | 57% | +$1.43M |
| 2 | $AMD | $505.74 | $1.70M (23) | $3.39M | $5.09M | +$2.97M | 56% | +$47K |
| 3 | $ARM | $261.53 | $1.25M (10) | $0.96M | $2.21M | +$3.52M | 69% | +$861K |
| 4 | $WULF | $17.86 | $645K (9) | $0.20M | $0.84M | +$230K | 54% | +$645K |
| 5 | $RIOT | $22.26 | $395K (3) | $0.11M | $0.50M | +$205K | 61% | +$395K |
| 6 | $CLSK | $13.48 | $208K (2) | $0.49M | $0.70M | +$395K | 70% | +$208K |
| 7 | $ALAB | $288.85 | $196K (2) | $0.06M | $0.26M | +$150K | 53% | −$35K ⚠️ |
| 8 | $RDDT | $149.38 | $166K (4) | $0.08M | $0.25M | +$541K | 60% | −$105K ⚠️ |
| 9 | $GM | $85.79 | $122K (1) | — | $0.12M | +$325K | 93% | +$122K |
| 10 | $NVO | $45.16 | $82K (2) | $0.14M | $0.22M | +$999K | 89% | +$82K |
| 11 | $ASX | $39.79 | $39K (1) | — | $0.04M | +$39K | 100% | +$39K |
| 12 | $APP | $312.01 | $35K (1) | $0.53M | $0.56M | +$245K | 54% | +$2K |
| 13 | $ECHO | $93.42 | $33K (1) | $0.18M | $0.21M | +$98K | 59% | +$33K |
| 14 | $PM | $184.73 | $26K (1) | $0.03M | $0.05M | +$39K | 65% | +$26K |
* strongSweepNet = swept call buys minus swept put buys — the pure "urgent directional" measure.
Also net-bullish but ZERO call-buying sweeps (excluded from the ranking)
| Ticker | What drove the bullish flow |
|---|---|
| $NXPI | +$787K via a single block call buy ($862K), 92% bullish — no sweeps |
| $PG | +$161K via block put selling only — income flow, not directional |
| $VCX | +$42K via put selling — no call buying at all |
| $MOH | +$24K via put selling — no call buying |
| $ELV | +$13K via put selling — no call buying |
| $USAR | +$12K via put selling — no call buying |
Key read-through
- Cleanest sweep-bullish setups: $SPCX stands out — $2.27M of urgent call buying, positive strongSweepNet (+$1.43M), 83% sweep share (urgency-dominant) and 54% repeat accumulation. $ARM is second-tier strong: $1.25M sweep calls, +$861K strongSweepNet, 68.6% bullish share with 52% repeat positioning.
- $AMD warning flag: Despite $5.1M in total call buying (top of the list including blocks), sweep share was only 53% and sold calls totaled $9.4M — the single biggest cell of the day. That's a premium-collection / bearish-reversal character. The net-bullish tag is carried more by put-selling ($9.1M) than by conviction buying.
- $ALAB and $RDDT caution: Both are net bullish overall, but their sweep flow was actually net bearish (put sweeps > call sweeps). The urgent money on those two leaned the other way, so they don't qualify as clean "sweep-bullish" despite the ranking position.
- $NVO nuance: 89% bullish share but ~$911K of that is sold puts (assign-at-strike positioning) — a floor bet, not upside speculation. Square with the fact that price ($45.16) is below the cloud and RSI 43: the flow says "willing to own lower," not "expects a squeeze higher."
- Small samples: $ASX, $GM, $PM, $ECHO, $APP each have only 1–4 sweep call trades — treat those as noise-tolerant, not high-conviction accumulation.
A squeeze + urgent call buying is a volatility-expansion setup worth a closer look — on the chart side, $SPCX (RSI 62, above cloud) and $ARM (back above EMA8 after a flush) have the most constructive price context for a bullish fire. Want me to build the full daily TA picture (support/resistance, Bollinger/Keltner tension, MACD) on the top 3–5 names?
Not Financial Advice
This analysis was generated by JarvisFlow's AI and is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. JarvisFlow or Finixis Inc. is not a registered investment advisor.