15-Day Money Flow Matrix Top 5 Picks: $LNG $CLF $MRK $PGR $EQT Flow Vs Price
Analysis generated
Go over each of them one after the other pulling 15 day money flow matrix for all the names one after other and then only pick top 5
15-Day Flow Matrix — All 11 Names (run one after another)
Note: window lengths returned differ by ticker (PGR 9 trading days, AME 7, LNG 12, CLF 13, TJX 15, EQT/BLK/AEM/MRK/AZO 16, CPRI 0). Comparing raw totals is unfair to the short windows; I lead with shares and strongSweepNet (urgent directional net), not just size.
| Ticker | Total Premium | Bullish / Bearish Share | Net Premium | strongSweepNet | Dominant Character | Chart Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $LNG | $3.42M | 70.1% / 29.9% | +$1.38M | +$1.75M | Call buys $1.95M vs call sold $981K; sweepShare 0.73, repeat 0.43 — urgent systematic accumulation | Full bull stack, MACD hist +1.45 expanding, extended |
| $CLF | $7.83M | 58.2% / 41.8% | +$1.28M | +$843K | Call bought $3.83M vs sold $2.50M; 10/16 flipped hard — $1.05M block call buys, $30K sold | Above all MAs, stack bullish, but 10/16 upper shadow to $12.69 |
| $MRK | $17.65M | 55.1% / 44.9% | +$1.79M | +$1.21M | Biggest book, but call sold $7.13M > bought $3.96M; put sold $5.75M → premium-collection dominant | Ranging, EMAs flat at $145, MACD hist -0.01 |
| $PGR | $4.10M | 33.0% / 67.0% | −$1.39M | +$209K | Call sold $2.67M vs bought $290K, escalating 10/14–10/16 (10/16 97% bearish, $1.04M) | Cleanest new EMA stack, MACD hist +0.75, but pinned at $222.8 band top |
| $EQT | $3.79M | 50.6% / 49.4% | +$49K | +$143K | Put sold $1.52M (bullish reversal) + call sold $1.75M; 10/16 bearish 64%, $582K | MACD hist +0.39, at BB $54.71 / Keltner $54.43; volume 8.04M vs 7.66M avg |
| $AZO | $9.45M | 50.1% / 49.9% | +$14K | −$206K | Block-dominant (sweepShare 0.24); 10/15–10/16 flipped bearish — $472K sweep put buys, $885K block call sales | Above bands $3,042/$3,044, volume 259K vs 342K avg, below SMA200 $3,271.98 |
| $TJX | $4.17M | 49.4% / 50.6% | −$50K | +$267K | Call sold $1.97M > bought $1.19M; 10/16 80.9% bearish ($445K) | RSI 74.8 overbought into SMA100 $147.50 / SMA200 $151.79 |
| $BLK | $7.38M | 26.0% / 74.0% | −$3.54M | +$542K | Call sold $5.05M vs bought $1.02M; 10/16 72% bearish incl. $772K block call sale | Closed $1,134.38 above BB $1,114 / Keltner $1,123.65, RSI 63.6, MACD hist +8.01 |
| $AEM | $16.71M | 14.1% / 85.9% | −$12.01M | +$17K | Call sold $14.10M vs bought $1.29M — heaviest premium-collection of the group | RSI 50.8, MACD hist +0.18, below SMA50 $195.26 |
| $AME | $1.45M | 16.1% / 83.9% | −$980K | −$13K | Call sold $1.14M; 5 of 7 days pure call selling | MACD hist -0.41, EMA13/SMA50 crossed down |
| $CPRI | — | — | — | — | No significant directional flow detected in the queried range (0 trading days) | RSI 65.5, squeeze 10.6%, SMA100 $16.22 overhead |
This isolates urgency-weighted direction — only $LNG clears $1M of net bought-call sweeps, with $MRK and $CLF next.
Top 5 (bullish flow that is NOT contradicted by price)
- $LNG — $289.43. Best flow on the board: +$1.75M strongSweepNet (largest by 45%), 70% bullish share, and the accumulation is repeat-based (repeatShare 0.43) on 16 sweep prints 10/13 — conviction, not a one-off. Chart agrees: EMA stack 281/279/278/276/273/267 fully expanding, MACD hist +1.45, price above every MA. Flaw: closed $289.43 above both BB $286.92 and Keltner top $288.66, and volume 1.63M is below the 1.79M average while 10/16 was call selling ($76K). Buy retests of $281–$283 (EMA8/span A), not $289.
- $CLF — $12.12. The clean one-sided flip: 10/16 produced $1.05M of block call buying against $30K of call sales (85.6% bullish), taking the 13-day net to +$1.28M and strongSweepNet to +$843K. Price sits above SMA50 $12.01 / SMA100 $11.74 / SMA200 $11.33 with a bullish EMA stack. Flaw: 10/16 printed a rejection wick to $12.69 and closed near the low at $12.12 on 24.9M volume (above 18.2M avg) — the flow and the candle disagree, so require a close above $12.69 before treating it as a swing.
- $MRK — $145.95. Highest total premium in the study ($17.65M) and strongSweepNet +$1.21M, with 55% bullish share. But this is premium-collection dominant — $7.13M call sold vs $3.96M bought, offset by $5.75M put sold (a floor bet). Chart gives no edge: EMAs 145.00/145.00/145.13 flat, MACD hist -0.01, price pinned on BB middle $145.80, RSI 51.9. Flow bullish, tape dead — a watch, not an entry.
- $PGR — $218.49. Positive urgent flow (+$209K strongSweepNet, MACD hist +0.75, best entry geometry of the group since price is still inside its bands at $222.82/$222.84). But the 15-day book is 67% bearish and call selling escalated three sessions running to $269K sweep + $714K block on 10/16 (97% bearish). Institutions are writing the ceiling right where the stack just crossed up — trade small or wait.
- $EQT — $54.30. Balanced book (+$49K net, strongSweepNet +$143K) with sellers of $1.52M puts signalling they don't expect sub-strike downside — a supportive floor. MACD hist +0.39 and volume 8.04M above the 7.66M average confirm participation. Flaw: sitting exactly at BB $54.71 / Keltner $54.43 with SMA200 $55.44 overhead, and 10/16 was 64% bearish.
Cut from the list
$BLK, $AEM, $TJX, $AZO, $AME — every one is premium-collection dominant on the call side (calls sold $5.05M/$14.10M/$1.97M/$3.42M/$1.14M vs far smaller call buying), which is a bearish-reversal signal: institutions are willing to sell at these levels. $BLK and $TJX compound it by being extended above their band tops on light-to-overbought momentum; $AZO's urgent net is negative and volume is below average. $CPRI returned zero unusual flow — no signal to rank.
Bottom line: only $LNG offers bullish flow and bullish structure simultaneously. $CLF is the second-best flow but needs the $12.69 candle confirmation. The other three carry an explicit flow/tape conflict.
Latest data as of: Friday, 16 October 2026.
Not Financial Advice
This analysis was generated by JarvisFlow's AI and is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. JarvisFlow or Finixis Inc. is not a registered investment advisor.